Precisão da medida do limiar anaeróbio por meio do calorímetro portátil / Measurement precision of the anaerobic threshold by means of a portable calorimeter / Precisión de la medición del umbral anaerobio por medio del calorímetro portátil

FUNDAMENTO: Muitos métodos são empregados para determinar o Limiar Anaeróbio (LAn) por meio de ergoespirômetros sofisticados. OBJETIVO: Testar a variação no LAn, detectado por modelos matemáticos e de inspeção visual, quando empregado ergoespirômetro de baixo custo e destinado à aplicação clínica. MÉTODOS: Foram voluntários para esse estudo 79 indivíduos aparentemente saudáveis; desses, 57 homens. O VO2máx e o limiar ventilatório foram determinados por calorimetria indireta de circuito aberto. O método eletroenzimático foi empregado para análise da lactacidemia e determinação direta do limiar de lactato (LL). O LAn foi determinado por dois métodos matemáticos (MM SQR e MMslope), baseados nas trocas gasosas, e pelo método de inspeção visual do log-log, para determinação do LL. Dois pesquisadores independentes determinaram o LAn através da inspeção visual de três gráficos, considerando dois métodos (LAn-a= V-slope, EqV; e LAn-b = V-slope, EqV e ExCO2). Os dados foram analisados por meio da estatística paramétrica para determinação das diferenças entre LAn-a versus ExCO2, MM SQR e MMslope; LAn-b versus MM SQR e MMslope; e LL versus LAn-a, LAN-b, MM SQR e MMslope. RESULTADOS: O MMslope foi o único método que apresentou diferença significativa entre o LAn-a e LAn-b (p=0,001), com CV por cento >15. O LL versus MMslope não apresentou diferença significativa (p=0,274), contudo, observou-se um elevado CV (24 por cento). CONCLUSÃO: Conclui-se que com o equipamento de baixo custo os métodos MM SQR e LAn-a podem ser utilizados para a determinação do LAn. O método MMslope não apresentou precisão satisfatória para ser empregado com esses equipamentos.

BACKGROUND: Many methods are used for determining the Anaerobic Threshold (AT) by means of sophisticated ergospirometer. OBJECTIVE: To test the AT variation, detected by mathematical models and visual inspection, when low cost ergospirometer is used and intended for clinical application. METHODS: Seventy nine apparently healthy subjects were volunteers in this study; from these, 57 men. The VO2max and the ventilatory threshold were determined by indirect, open-circuit calorimetry. The electro-enzymatic method was used for analyzing the lactacidemia and direct determination of the Lactate Threshold (LT). The AT was determined by two mathematical methods (MM RSS and MMslope), based on the gases exchange, and by the log-log visual method, for determining the LT. Two independent investigators determined the AT through visual inspection of three graphs, considering two methods (AT-a= V-slope, EqV; and AT-b = V-slope, EqV and ExCO2). The data were analyzed by means of parametric statistics for determining the differences between AT-a versus ExCO2, MM RSS and MMslope; AT-b versus MM RSS and MMslope; and LT versus AT-a, AT-b, MM RSS and MMslope. RESULTS: The MMslope was the only method that presented a significant difference between the AT-a and AT-b (p=0.001), with CV percent >15. LT versus MMslope did not present significant difference (p=0.274), however, it was observed a high CV (24 percent). CONCLUSION: It was concluded that with the low cost equipment, the MM RSS and AT-a methods can be used for determining the TAn. The MMslope method did not present satisfactory precision to be employed with this equipment.

FUNDAMENTO: Muchos métodos se emplean para que se determine el Umbral Anaerobio (UAn) por medio de ergoespirómetros sofisticados. OBJETIVO: Probar la variación en el UAn, detectado por modelos matemáticos y de inspección visual, cuando empleado ergoespirómetro de bajo costo y destinado a la aplicación clínica. MÉTODOS: Fueron voluntarios para este estudio 79 individuos aparentemente sanos; de ellos, 57 varones. El VO2máx y el umbral ventilatorio se determinaron por calorimetría indirecta de circuito abierto. El método electroenzimático se empleó para análisis de lactacidemia y determinación directa del umbral de lactato (UL). El UAn fue determinado por dos métodos matemáticos (MM SQR y MMslope), basados en los cambios gaseosos, y por el método de inspección visual del log-log, para determinación del UL. Dos investigadores independientes determinaron el UAn a través de la inspección visual de tres gráficos, teniendo en cuenta dos métodos (UAn-a= V-slope, EqV; y UAn-b = V-slope, EqV y ExCO2). Los datos se analizaron por medio de la estadística paramétrica para determinación de las diferencias entre UAn-a versus ExCO2, MM SQR y MMslope; UAn-b versus MM SQR y MMslope; y UL versus UAn-a, UAN-b, MM SQR y MMslope. RESULTADOS: El MMslope fue el único método que presentó diferencia significativa entre el UAn-a y UAn-b (p=0,001), con CV por ciento >15. El UL versus MMslope no presentó diferencia significativa (p=0,274), con todo, se observó un elevado CV (24 por ciento). CONCLUSIÓN: Se concluyó que con el equipamiento de bajo costo los métodos MM SQR y UAn-a pueden utilizarse para la determinación del UAn. El método MMslope no presentó precisión satisfactoria para ser empleado con estos equipamientos.

The cost-effectiveness of a questionnaire as a screening test for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among the Bangkok elderly.

This study aimed to explore the cost-effectiveness of using a questionnaire as a screening test for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) among the Bangkok elderly residing around Siriraj Hospital. The gold standard used for diagnosing COPD followed the guidelines of the Thoracic Society of Thailand. The questionnaire consisted of 10 questions on smoking status, respiratory symptoms and previous history of pulmonary tuberculosis. There were 3,094 elderly who participated, completed the questionnaire, and underwent spirometry as well as chest radiography in the community. The results showed that elderly individuals who are smokers (> 0.5 pack-year) or have ever experienced sudden cough with chest oppression or dyspnea when the weather changes or who have expectorated more than two tablespoons of sputum would be suspected of having COPD with a sensitiviy of 81.4 per cent (95% CI 79.4-83.4), specificity of 62.2 per cent (95% CI 60.4-64.0) false negative rate 1.2 per cent (95% CI 0.7-1.7) and false positive rate 38 per cent (95% CI 35.3-40.7) and subsequently required spirometry and chest X-ray for definitive diagnosis. The test needed to screen 17 elderly individuals to detect one COPD case at a cost of 1,538 baht. This questionnaire is also a self-assessment tool for COPD screening among the elderly in order to encourage them to seek for early medical attention and it is recommended that this should be publicized via the mass media.

The cost-effectiveness of chest radiography as a screening test for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among the Bangkok elderly.

Regular screening with chest radiography (CXR) in an annual physical check up of the elderly is most frequently practiced. This study aimed to identify the CXR indices and the cost-effectiveness of CXR as a screening test for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) among the elderly in 124 urban communities of Bangkok around Siriraj Hospital. The gold standard for diagnosing COPD followed the guidelines of the Thoracic Society of Thailand. There were 3,094 subjects who participated, completed spirometry and a CXR. The selected nine indices from PA and lateral CXR for diagnosing COPD were based on the presence of hyperinflation. The positive criteria of each index were reported. The cut-off point of best average accuracy ie, Z score of the CXR was 0.07 with a sensitivity of 75.9 per cent (95% CI 70.2-81.6%), specificity of 72.4 per cent (95% CI 70.8-74.0%) and the best average accuracy of 74.1 per cent (95% CI 72.5-75.7%) whereas the cost-effective cut-off point of a Z score of CXR as a screening test for COPD was 0.04 at the lowest grand total cost. The cost to detect one case of COPD was 2,008 baht and needed to screen 17 elderly. It is suggested that CXR is probably not a suitable screening test for COPD in the elderly due to the complicated derivation of the CXR indices. However, its efficacy may be of some value in in-office diagnosis of COPD.